Published on and written by Cyril Jarnias
Moving to Bolivia is increasingly appealing to retirees, digital nomads, and mobile executives. But behind the moderate cost of living and spectacular landscapes, the tax question is central. Especially since Bolivia applies a very particular system, based almost exclusively on the territoriality of income. For an expat who works, invests, or buys real estate, understanding income tax and property tax is not a luxury, it’s a necessity.
This article details the taxation of professional income, remote service fees, rental income, and real estate assets for non-Bolivian individuals. It also covers cases where the wealth tax and risks of double taxation may apply.
A Tax System Dominated by the Source Principle
Before delving into the details of taxes, one must understand the logic of the Bolivian system. Bolivia bases its tax legislation on the source principle as stated in Law 843, the true backbone of local tax law.
Concretely, this principle means that Bolivia taxes income that originates within its territory, regardless of the nationality, domicile, or residence of the beneficiary. What matters is not “who you are,” but “where the income is generated.”
The law specifies that the following are considered Bolivian-source income:
According to Bolivian tax regulations, the following are notably taxable: profits derived from assets located or economically used in Bolivia; benefits from acts or activities carried out on national territory; and gains from events occurring within the country’s borders. These criteria define the income tax base for activities with an economic link to Bolivian territory.
It does not matter if the contract was signed abroad, if the paying company is foreign, or if the beneficiary lives outside the country: if the economic source of the income is Bolivian, the tax is, in principle, due in Bolivia.
Conversely, unlike countries like Chile (residence principle) or the United States (citizenship principle), Bolivia does not tax, as a general rule, foreign-source income received by a resident. This point is key for an expat who keeps part of their income internationally.
The Main Taxes Affecting an Expat
For a foreign individual, several taxes may come into play:
The Bolivian tax system notably includes: the Complementary VAT Regime (RC‑IVA), which serves as the personal income tax; the taxation mechanism for non-residents via withholding (IUE‑BE and new RC‑IVA rules); the annual property tax (IPBI), the main land tax; related real estate taxes (transfer, rental, inheritance, gift…); and, for very high assets, the wealth tax (IGF).
Each of these taxes follows a different logic and involves different authorities (national or municipal level), which explains the practical complexity for an expat who is a property owner or professionally active.
RC‑IVA: The “Real” Income Tax in Bolivia
Contrary to what its name suggests, the Complementary VAT Regime (RC‑IVA) is not just a VAT annex: in practice, it is the personal income tax.
What RC‑IVA Taxes
The RC‑IVA, established during the 1986 tax reform, taxes at 13% Bolivian-source income derived from:
– labor (salaries, overtime, bonuses, gratuities, commissions, incentives, indemnities in cash or in kind);
– capital (interest, dividends, royalties, commissions, investment yields…);
– or a combination of both (independent activity, consulting fees, etc.).
The income tax (RC-IVA) applies to all Bolivian-source income, regardless of the taxpayer’s domicile or nationality. No minimum length of stay is required to be taxable: as soon as income is considered Bolivian, this tax may apply.
However, the regime provides for an original mechanism: the tax due can be reduced by crediting a tax credit based on VAT paid on certain purchases (properly recorded invoices), as well as a deduction from taxable income. Furthermore, a 50% deduction as a minimum non-taxable amount is provided in the RC‑IVA calculation logic; for modest incomes, a 10% refund on certain invoices is possible.
How RC‑IVA is Declared and Paid
The RC‑IVA distinguishes two main categories of taxpayers:
– salaried employees in a dependent relationship;
– independent contractors and other persons receiving capital or rental income.
For employees, the employer acts as a withholding agent. They calculate the income tax monthly, withhold it directly from the salary, and remit it to the Servicio de Impuestos Nacionales (SIN). An annual reconciliation is then performed to precisely adjust the employee’s tax situation, based on their annual income tax return.
For independent contractors (consultants, freelancers, small landlords, etc.), one must obtain a NIT (Tax Identification Number) and regularly file RC‑IVA declarations using the appropriate forms. Since 2023, independent professions that previously fell under the IUE have been integrated into this regime.
For expats, the difficulty lies in the non‑resident status: for a long time, there was no clear mechanism for a person visiting or working temporarily to determine and pay the RC‑IVA.
Non‑Residents: A Legislative Turning Point for Income Tax
For years, Bolivian legislation did not provide an operational procedure for non‑resident individuals to pay RC‑IVA on work performed in Bolivia. The tax authority then had to rely on other tools, notably the IUE‑BE (withholding on profits sent abroad), designed for legal entities.
This gap gave rise to Proposed Law No. 256‑21 and the reform carried out by Law 1448, which amend Law 843.
What the Reform Changes for Expats
Article 19 of Law 843 was rewritten to explicitly include:
– income received by non-resident persons from work performed on national territory.
The idea is simple: whenever a non‑resident physically carries out an activity in Bolivia, the income derived from that activity must be subject to RC‑IVA, just like that of a resident. The key condition remains the location of the service provision: physical presence in Bolivia.
A foreign consultant invoicing from their home country but physically traveling to Bolivia for their assignment is subject to RC‑IVA. Conversely, a provider fully delivering their service remotely, without ever going to Bolivia, is in principle not subject to RC‑IVA, even for a Bolivian client, subject to the application of other tax mechanisms (like IUE‑BE) and the tax treaties in force.
An important exception is provided: earnings received by non-resident athletes and artists for participation in international contests, tournaments, or competitions in Bolivia are excluded from the new scope.
How Must a Non‑Resident Comply?
The reform provides two paths to compliance for a non‑resident expat:
1. Withholding at Source by the Local Payer
In this scheme, it is the Bolivian entity (company or individual) that becomes the withholding agent:
For service fees provided by a non-resident provider in Bolivia: if a Bolivian company is invoiced without a local tax invoice, it must withhold 16% (13% RC‑IVA + 3% IT) and remit it via forms 604 and 410. If the debtor is a Bolivian individual, they must withhold 13% (RC‑IVA) and pay it within five business days following payment or completion of the service, using form 607.
In these cases, the non‑resident receives a net amount, and the withholding in principle fulfills their tax obligation in Bolivia on that income.
2. Direct Contribution by the Non‑Resident
The non‑resident can choose (or be required) to pay their RC‑IVA directly:
– they must register in the SIN taxpayer registry under the category “RC‑IVA non domiciliado” and obtain a NIT;
– they calculate the RC‑IVA due themselves and declare it via forms 613 (payment in bolivianos) or 614 (payment in dollars);
– payment must occur no later than the third business day of the month following receipt of the income, or before leaving the country, whichever of these two deadlines comes first.
The choice between the flat 16% withholding and direct tax payment is not neutral. In some situations, the flat withholding may prove more costly than a precise calculation based on RC‑IVA, which allows for deductions and tax credits.
Impact on the Tax Burden of Expats
In previous practice, when a Bolivian company remunerated a foreign provider for a service, it generally applied: the tax rules in force to determine the applicable treatment for this remuneration.
– either a 12.5% withholding under IUE‑BE (Corporate Profits Tax – Foreign Beneficiaries) on the amount sent abroad;
– or 15.5% (12.5% IUE + 3% IT) in some arrangements.
With the extension of RC‑IVA to non‑residents, the tax burden can rise to about 16% (13% RC‑IVA + 3% IT) when the chosen option is withholding at source. This represents an increase for some profiles and raises the question of the exact articulation between RC‑IVA and IUE‑BE: coexistence or substitution? The texts suggest that for non‑resident independent providers, RC‑IVA could replace IUE, but that the 3% IT would continue to apply.
In any case, this evolution goes hand in hand with a strengthening of cooperation between administrations (immigration, banks, consulates, etc.) to identify non‑residents carrying out activities in Bolivia.
Double Taxation: The Role of Tax Treaties
The logic of the source principle can collide with that of the expat’s home country, especially if the latter applies a residence or worldwide principle. This is typically the case for a German national living and doing business in Bolivia: they are taxable in Bolivia on their local-source income, but also in Germany on their worldwide income, unless mechanisms like tax credits or exemptions apply.
To limit these situations, Bolivia has concluded several agreements to avoid double taxation, notably with:
– Argentina;
– Spain;
– France;
– Germany;
– Sweden;
– the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland.
It is also a party to Decision 578 of the Andean Community (CAN), which covers tax relations with Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia.
Two Treaty Logics: Source vs. Residence
The agreements signed with Argentina and within the CAN framework follow the Bolivian philosophy: professional income is taxable in the State where the work is performed. An Argentine who comes to work temporarily in Bolivia will therefore in principle be taxed here on their Bolivian-source income.
Conversely, the treaties with Spain, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, or Sweden follow the OECD model, centered on tax residence:
– for independent contractor income (freelance professions, consultants), taxation reverts to the country of residence, unless the person has a permanent establishment in Bolivia;
– for salaried employees, the salary normally remains taxable in the State of residence, unless the employment is exercised in Bolivia and certain conditions are met (stay of more than 183 days in a year, local employer, salary borne by a permanent establishment in Bolivia).
The new legislation on RC‑IVA applies primarily to residents of countries linked by tax treaties with France. These international treaties, which take precedence over domestic law, can restrict its application. Special cases exist for residents of other countries.
Practical Application for an Expat
Imagine a French consultant who spends four months a year in Bolivia on a project, paid by a French client. If there is no permanent establishment in Bolivia and they do not exceed 183 days on-site, the Franco‑Bolivian treaty tends to reserve the right to tax to France. Bolivia should therefore not seek to collect RC‑IVA on this income, provided the taxpayer can produce a French tax residence certificate.
Conversely, a Peruvian consultant coming to work in La Paz for a Bolivian company falls under Decision 578 of the CAN, which is more “territorial”: the income is taxable where it is generated, so in Bolivia, and RC‑IVA will apply.
This is to say that for each expat, the combination “Bolivian internal rules + any applicable treaty + law of their home country” must be carefully analyzed.
Bolivian Property Tax: IPBI, a 100% Municipal Tax
For an expat owning an apartment in La Paz or a country house in the Yungas, the key tax is not national, but municipal: the Property Tax on Real Estate (IPBI).
Who Pays and on What?
The IPBI is an annual tax that levies the ownership or possession of real estate – urban or rural – located in Bolivia. It is a purely local tax, collected and managed by municipal governments. Each house, apartment, land, or building constitutes, in principle, a separate taxable object.
The generating event is being the owner or possessor of the property on December 31st of each year. The taxpayer is in principle:
– the owner registered in the municipal cadastre;
– failing that, the person holding a transfer title (e.g., a deed of sale) on December 31st even if registration is not yet complete;
– the possessor or occupant, if the ownership right is not legally “perfect.”
For co-owned properties, the municipal tax authority treats the property as a single entity: the tax must be paid in full, and the co‑owners are jointly and severally liable. Within the marital framework, the husband is deemed responsible for community property, even if it is in the wife’s name, unless there is a legal separation of assets.
Condominium associations are considered debtors for the entire tax corresponding to the common property.
How is the Taxable Base Calculated?
The particularity of IPBI is that it is based on fiscal values established within the cadastral framework, and not on the actual market value nor on simple self‑declaration.
The taxable base is thus constituted by: the sum of net income received by the taxpayer, after deduction of charges and allowances authorized by tax legislation.
The value of a property in Bolivia is determined differently depending on its nature: for urban properties, the avalúo fiscal (fiscal value) calculated by the municipality is used; for rural properties, a self-assessment guided by tables and zoning from the National Cadastre Directorate and the Ministry of Finance; for legal entities, the book value from financial statements; and in case of expropriation, the ‘justiprecio’, which corresponds to the compensation price.
The fiscal value of an urban property breaks down into two elements: the land and the construction. The standard calculation follows four steps:
1. determination of the land’s fiscal value (unit land value × surface area × basic services coefficient × slope coefficient); 2. determination of the construction’s fiscal value (built area × value per m² according to construction type × depreciation coefficient); 3. addition of the two to obtain the taxable base; 4. application of the rate schedule and coefficients (marginal rate + possible “fixed quota”).
To illustrate, an official simulation for the 2022 period resulted in a tax of 199 bolivianos for a property with:
– a land surface of 360 m², a land value of 25, basic services rated 6, and a neutral slope (coefficient 1), i.e., a land fiscal value of 5,400 Bs;
– a construction of 90 m² classified as “good,” with a standard value of 586 Bs/m² and a depreciation factor of 0.975, i.e., a construction value of 51,421.5 Bs;
– a total taxable base of 56,821.5 Bs;
– an effective rate of 0.35%, giving a gross tax of approximately 199 Bs.
The construction rates per m² vary strongly according to quality (from “luxury” to “marginal”), for example:
| Construction Type | Indicative Range (Bs/m²) |
|---|---|
| Luxury | 1,132.20 to 1,310.00 |
| Very Good | 750.60 to 950.00 |
| Good | 604.80 to 670.00 |
| Economic | 430.00 to 491.40 |
| Social Interest | 100.40 to 288.00 |
| Marginal | 35.00 to 73.80 |
Each municipality adopts, on this national basis, its own grids, rate variations, and schedules, updated by supreme resolution each year.
Tax Rates and Schedule
The IPBI functions with a progressive rate schedule, the overall range in practice being between about 0.01% and 1% of the taxable base according to sources and value classes. Examples of schedules show, for instance, that a taxable base from 0 to 200,000 bolivianos can be taxed at a rate of 0.35%.
The tax amount is often calculated in the form: taxable amount x tax rate
– (taxable base – bracket threshold) × marginal rate + fixed quota for the bracket.
The rate schedule and fixed quotas are defined in Law 843 (art. 57) and updated each year by supreme resolution, or by municipal ordinance when the community has adopted its own regulation. When the municipality has not yet developed its regulation, the Ministry of Economy and Public Finance provides the applicable scales.
For rural properties, there is in parallel an agricultural tax (RAU regime) with a rate of 0.25% mentioned in Law 3545 for certain activities, in addition to IPBI.
Practical Payment of the Property Tax
In practice, taxpayers have a cadastral number or a real estate property number, registered in the Municipal Taxpayer Registry (PMC) and the RUAT system (Single Tax Administration Registry). Using this number, they can check and pay their IPBI:
– online, via the RUAT platform and banking apps (e.g., Banco Unión, section “pago impuestos RUAT – inmueble”);
– or at the counter of authorized banks, upon presentation of the ID card and the property number.
Payment is made in a single installment for the entire year. The system generally does not allow partial payments within the same fiscal year, although payment plans may be granted (without benefiting from discounts).
Municipalities often implement an incentive calendar:
| Payment Period | Typical Advantage / Penalty |
|---|---|
| First months of the year | Discount of 5% to 20% |
| From June onward | Possible surcharge up to 10% |
| Extended delay | Fixed fines + daily penalty |
Not paying the IPBI for many years (e.g., 10 to 15 years) exposes the owner to extreme measures, up to the seizure of the property by the municipality. Furthermore, any property sale must be accompanied by full settlement of the IPBI to be registered in the real rights registry.
Exemptions and Reductions for Certain Owners
The IPBI regime provides for numerous exemptions, notably:
Bolivian law provides several exemptions from the property tax. Notably covered are: small peasant farms and non-cultivable rural areas, with thresholds varying by region (e.g., 10 ha north of Lake Titicaca, 15 ha near Lake Poopó, 35 ha in southern Andean and puna zones); lands of indigenous communities and ethnic groups used for their traditional productive activities; properties of recognized non-profit organizations (churches, charities, Red Cross, scouts); premises of foreign diplomatic missions; certain officially recognized ecological reserves and hydrological basins annually; and certain categories of persons, such as “beneméritos” of the Chaco War, under specific conditions.
Persons aged 60 or older, owning a low-value property, can benefit from a 20% reduction on IPBI, according to local rules. Public entities (central State, municipalities) are also exempt for their properties, without any special procedure.
To benefit from a status-related exemption (association, foundation, foreign mission, etc.), one generally must submit:
– an official property title;
– legal personality and approved bylaws;
– a legalized copy of the exemption resolution issued by the municipality;
– for ecological reserves, a document from the competent authority qualifying the area.
Ancillary Real Estate Taxes: Transfer, Rental, Inheritance, Gift
Owning property in Bolivia is not limited to IPBI. Other taxes may concern an expat owner or heir.
Real Estate Transfer Tax
Any real estate sale is subject to a municipal tax of 3% on the transaction value. This transfer duty applies to most transfers for valuable consideration, provided the seller is not a company whose usual activity is trading real estate (in which case the corporate profits regime applies).
Deadline in business days to make the payment after signing the deed, under penalty of fines.
Rental Income Taxation
Renting out a Bolivian property generates several taxes, combining VAT (IVA), Transaction Tax (IT), RC‑IVA, and for legal entities, IUE. Overall:
– the gross rent may bear an effective monthly withholding between 13% and 16%;
– the RC‑IVA component of 13% can be declared quarterly;
– the IUE component of 25% for corporate rental income is generally settled annually.
In all cases, it is the owner‑lessor who is liable for payment of these taxes, even though withholdings at source may be provided for in some arrangements.
Inheritance, Advance Inheritance, and Gift
Inheritance and advance inheritance are taxed, but the effective burden remains quite moderate for reserved heirs (children, spouse, parents).
The maximum effective rate of inheritance tax for reserved heirs, typically ranging between 0.1% and 2.4% of the property’s theoretical value.
For an expat owning property in Bolivia, transfer to their heirs (Bolivian or not) thus remains fiscally bearable, but requires good anticipation of local formalities.
Wealth Tax: An Issue for High Net Worth Individuals
For wealthy expats, Bolivia has introduced a Wealth Tax (IGF), which adds to income and property taxes.
Who is Concerned and From What Threshold?
The IGF exclusively targets individuals, regardless of their nationality. It taxes the net wealth held on December 31st of each year when its amount exceeds 30 million bolivianos (approximately several million dollars depending on the exchange rate).
The following are liable:
– individuals resident in Bolivia, for their worldwide wealth (assets located in Bolivia and abroad);
– non‑resident individuals, for their wealth located in Bolivia.
Number of days of stay required over a twelve‑month period to be considered a tax resident in France.
– persons present for tourism or a specific purpose for a period not exceeding 183 days;
– persons making several stays whose cumulative duration does not exceed 183 days;
– agents of diplomatic missions and international organizations.
Taxable Base and Rate Schedule
The taxable base of the IGF is the sum of the values of all asset items: real estate, vehicles, boats, planes, business assets, stakes in companies, bank deposits, receivables, etc., minus certain debts (e.g., loans from regulated financial institutions in Bolivia or abroad).
For real estate located in Bolivia, the value taken is the highest among:
Three distinct values used for real estate valuation: market value, acquisition value adjusted by UFV, and the previous period’s fiscal value for IPBI.
For assets located abroad, either the value accepted for tax purposes in the concerned country, or the highest market value is taken.
Once the net wealth is determined, a progressive rate schedule is applied:
| Net Wealth Bracket (Bs) | IGF Rate |
|---|---|
| 30,000,001 – 40,000,000 | 1.4% |
| 40,000,001 – 50,000,000 | 1.9% |
| From 50,000,001 onward | 2.4% |
For example, a taxable base of 70 million bolivianos can lead to a tax of around 1.68 million bolivianos, depending on the precise calculation applied.
Good to know: municipal taxes paid on real estate and vehicles (like IPBI) for the previous period can be credited against the IGF, which reduces the overall burden.
Residents declare and pay the IGF by the last business day of March; non‑residents, by the last business day of April, with the possibility of payment from abroad in dollars to a dedicated SIN account.
Resident and Non‑Resident Status: A Fiscal Pivot
For an expat, the distinction between resident and non‑resident is not only about immigration; it conditions the scope of certain taxes, notably the IGF and the application of some tax treaties.
183‑Day Criterion
In practice, Bolivia aligns its approach with the international 183‑day standard to characterize residence:
– more than 183 days of presence over a rolling 12‑month period: tendency to consider the person as a resident;
– less than 183 days, short‑term stays, or tourism: non‑resident.
Bolivian law no longer has an explicit definition of “non‑domiciled” in a current law, but the repealed Law 471 of 1969, which already used the 180‑day threshold, often serves as a doctrinal reference, as do the practices of neighboring countries (Peru, Brazil, Chile, Spain).
Bolivian Tax Residence Certificates
To benefit from double taxation treaties or prove tax residence in Bolivia to another country, an expat can request a Tax Residence Certificate from the SIN.
The procedure, detailed in a 2017 administrative resolution, provides for:
– an online request on the SIN portal, followed by formalization at an office within ten business days;
– presentation of supporting documents: migration certificate with entry dates (for foreigners), work certificate, shareholder registry (for investors), etc.;
– processing within fifteen days by the administration, with possible requests for additional information.
The certificate, valid for 365 days, then allows the Bolivian residence to be asserted within the framework of tax treaties, for example to obtain a tax credit in the home country.
Synthetic Practical Case: Expat Property Owner and Consultant
To concretely measure the impact of this taxation, imagine the case of a European who:
– obtains temporary residence in Bolivia;
– buys an apartment in Cochabamba;
– works as a consultant for clients both in Bolivia and abroad.
Regarding income tax:
The income of an independent contractor working in Bolivia is subject to distinct tax rules depending on the origin of clients and the location of service provision. Fees invoiced to Bolivian clients for services physically performed in Bolivia are Bolivian‑source income, subject to RC‑IVA. As a resident, the contractor must declare and pay like a local independent, with obtaining a NIT, use of electronic invoicing, and the possibility of crediting a tax credit via purchase invoices. Assignments performed remotely for foreign clients with no economic link to Bolivia are in principle exempt from RC‑IVA, subject to the specific rules of the contractor’s home country. For services performed from Bolivia for European clients, it is necessary to check the provisions of the applicable tax treaty, assess the permanent establishment risk, and understand each concerned country’s interpretation of the income source.
Regarding property tax:
The transfer tax due on the declared sale price when reselling real estate in Bolivia is 3%.
Regarding wealth tax:
– if they do not exceed the threshold of 30 million bolivianos of worldwide net wealth, they are not concerned by the IGF;
– above that, the apartment will be included in the taxable base at the highest of the market value, the adjusted acquisition value, or the IPBI value, which may encourage close monitoring of cadastral evolution.
Finally, they will need to carefully articulate Bolivian taxation with that of their country of nationality, using if possible tax treaties and residence certificates to avoid economic double taxation on the same income or the same wealth.
Conclusion: A Demanding but Predictable Tax System for the Informed Expat
Bolivia offers, on paper, a readable tax environment for the expat: the country primarily taxes what is generated within its territory, leaves foreign‑source income relatively untouched, and reserves the wealth tax for very high net worth individuals. On the other hand, the granularity of the system – coexistence of RC‑IVA, IUE‑BE withholdings, municipal taxes like IPBI, taxes on transfers, rentals, inheritances, plus IGF – imposes real monitoring discipline.
The recent reform extends the RC‑IVA regime to non‑residents, including seconded technicians, consultants, artists, athletes, and visiting experts. These individuals can no longer benefit from the old procedural gaps. The effective tax cost, determined by flat‑rate withholdings or direct payment, can vary significantly. Therefore, simulating different tax scenarios is recommended.
On the real estate side, IPBI is moderate compared to some European countries, but its mechanism of fiscal value and progressive rates, modulated by each municipality, deserves a numerical check before any investment. The modest transfer taxes and fairly lenient inheritance taxation for reserved heirs constitute favorable elements for expat owners.
To avoid double taxation, it is crucial to check for the existence of a tax treaty between Bolivia and your home country and to precisely define your tax residence. Plan your project by integrating a global strategy, based on both Bolivian legislation (Law 843, Law 1448, RC‑IVA, IPBI, IGF) and the provisions of applicable international treaties.
In summary, Bolivia is not a tax “black hole,” but a country with a sophisticated territorial‑type system. For those who master its rules, income tax and property tax can remain predictable and optimizable, even for an expat who wishes to settle there long‑term, work, invest, and pass on assets.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. We encourage you to consult qualified experts before making any investment, real estate, or expatriation decisions. Although we strive to maintain up-to-date and accurate information, we do not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the proposed content. As investment and expatriation involve risks, we disclaim any liability for potential losses or damages arising from the use of this site. Your use of this site confirms your acceptance of these terms and your understanding of the associated risks.
Cyril Jarnias is an independent expert in international wealth management with over 20 years of experience. As an expatriate himself, he is dedicated to helping individuals and business leaders build, protect, and pass on their wealth with complete peace of mind.
On his website, cyriljarnias.com, he shares his expertise on international real estate, offshore company formation, and expatriation.
Thanks to his expertise, he offers sound advice to optimize his clients' wealth management. Cyril Jarnias is also recognized for his appearances in many prestigious media outlets such as BFM Business, les Français de l’étranger, Le Figaro, Les Echos, and Mieux vivre votre argent, where he shares his knowledge and know-how in wealth management.
